四川盆地海相页岩固体沥青与沥青包裹体成熟度对比分析及地质意义

Comparative Analysis of Maturity between Solid Bitumen and Bitumen Inclusions in Marine Shale of the Sichuan Basin and Its Geological Significance

  • 摘要: 有机质成熟度是评价烃源岩生烃潜力与页岩气保存条件的重要指标。近年来,激光拉曼光谱技术因其非破坏性和高分辨率特性,在古老海相页岩有机质成熟度研究中得到广泛应用。已有学者通过页岩固体沥青的拉曼光谱特征建立了热演化程度的定量模型,但页岩固体沥青与沥青包裹体成熟度的定量差异及适用边界尚缺乏系统厘定,成为制约高—过成熟页岩热史精确重建与烃源岩精细评价的难点。本文以四川盆地下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩及其裂缝脉体矿物中的沥青包裹体为研究对象,通过显微激光拉曼光谱技术结合分峰拟合,系统对比了页岩固体沥青与沥青包裹体的成熟度差异,为海相页岩有机质成熟度评价提供新视角。研究结果表明:基于峰高比参数(ID1/IG)计算的页岩固体沥青成熟度范围为3.32%~3.64%,沥青包裹体为3.51%~3.71%,数据离散性较低;同一深度样品中,沥青包裹体成熟度普遍高于页岩固体沥青,其绝对值相差0.02%~0.22%,表明封闭体系更有利于保存有机质的热演化信息。同时考虑到开放体系中环境引起的次生变化亦会对烃源岩生烃能力产生影响,本文认为沥青包裹体适用于有机质埋藏-热演化历史重建,而页岩固体沥青成熟度更宜作为烃源岩评价指标。

     

    Abstract: Organic matter maturity serves as a critical indicator for evaluating hydrocarbon generation potential of source rocks and shale gas preservation conditions. In recent years, laser Raman spectroscopy has been widely applied to study organic matter maturity in ancient marine shales due to its non-destructive nature and high resolution. Although scholars have established quantitative models for thermal evolution degree based on Raman spectral characteristics of solid bitumen in shales, significant research gaps remain in characterizing the maturity of bitumen inclusions within fracture-filling minerals. This study focuses on the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale and bitumen inclusions in fracture-filling minerals from the Sichuan Basin. Through micro-laser Raman spectroscopy combined with peak deconvolution, maturity differences between bitumen inclusions and solid bitumen in shales are systematically compared, providing new perspectives for marine shale organic matter maturity evaluation. Results demonstrate that the calculated maturity of shale solid bitumen based on peak height ratio (ID1/IG) ranges from 3.32% to 3.64%, whereas bitumen inclusions range from 3.51% to 3.71% with lower data dispersion. At identical depths, bitumen inclusions generally exhibit higher maturity than solid bitumen, with absolute differences of 0.02%–0.22%, indicating that closed systems better preserve thermal evolution information of organic matter. Bitumen inclusions are more suitable for reconstructing organic matter thermal history, whereas solid bitumen maturity in shale should primarily serve as an evaluation index for source rocks.

     

/

返回文章
返回