Abstract: Sterane and terpane compounds are key biomarkers in petroleum geochemistry to identify organic matter sources, depositional environments, and thermal evolution. The reliability of their analysis directly affects the accuracy of oil-source correlation and maturity assessment. This study compares GC-MS and GC-MS/MS in analyzing sterane and terpane compounds, focusing on the parameter characteristics and their geological significance. Using Single Ion Monitoring (SIM) and Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) to obtain parameters, sterane triangular plots and ratio parameters were employed for comprehensive evaluation. Results show consistent identification of organic matter sources, indicating mixed-source input dominated by lower aquatic organisms. The average differences in C₂₉-20S/(20S + 20R), C₂₉-αββ/(ααα + αββ), and C₂₇-αββ/(ααα + αββ) measurements were all less than 0.05, with overall trends consistent across both methods. Notably, GC-MS/MS yields C₂₉-20S/(20S + 20R) values closer to the evolutionary endpoint (～0.55), which align better with the measured vitrinite reflectance (R_o) values (0.84% – 1.40%). For terpane parameters, GC-MS/MS shows an average Ts/Tm value approximately 0.18 – 0.28 higher than GC-MS, and a lower Ga/C₃₀H value by approximately 0.11 – 0.12, yet both methods maintain consistency in depositional environment identification and maturity trends. In conclusion, while GC-MS remains valuable for routine sterane and terpane analysis, GC-MS/MS offers higher accuracy in maturity assessment for high maturity or complex matrix samples by enhancing selectivity and resolution, providing more reliable technical support for fine-scale geochemical analysis of sterane and terpane compounds.