地下水系统中植酸与降解产物的检测方法及环境行为研究进展

A Review of Research Progress on Detection Methods and Environmental Behaviors of Phytic Acid and Its Degradation Products in Groundwater Systems

  • 摘要: 植酸(IP6)占有机磷的50%~80%,随动植物残体、农业活动(磷肥、畜禽粪便等分解)及工业生产的植酸废弃物输入地下水系统后,在地下水和含水介质中迁移和转化,通过水-含水介质-微生物反应影响磷的赋存形态和生物有效性,引起农业面源及水体富营养化污染风险。本文阐述了植酸的理化性质、来源与赋存形态,对比了植酸及其降解产物的多种检测技术,并揭示了植酸主要环境行为的作用机制。已有研究表明:①液相色谱-质谱联用技术(LC-MS/MS)更能有效分离植酸及其降解产物并对其进行定量,具有较高的灵敏度、准确度和精密度;②地下水系统中植酸主要的环境行为包括水解、生物降解和吸附-解吸,这些过程主要受温度、pH、水化学组分及介质矿物组成等因素调控;③水解速率受温度影响最大,随温度升高而增加;生物降解主要依靠分泌植酸酶攻击特定磷酸酯键,进而逐步脱磷酸基团,最终生成肌醇和磷酸根;吸附-解吸作用反应速率最快,主要通过静电作用、氢键作用、配位络合吸附在矿物表面,其中铁铝(氢)氧化物对植酸的吸附作用最强。地下水系统中共存的含氧阴离子(如\mathrmAsO_3^3- 、\mathrmAsO_4^3- 以及无机磷\mathrmPO_4^3- 等)也会与植酸形成竞争吸附。植酸与矿物表面亲和力更强,可解吸吸附态As和无机磷,增加其生物有效性,提高其生态环境风险。建议未来研究聚焦:①矿物吸附态植酸的生物和非生物降解途径,以及降解产物的环境风险;②植酸对多种共存金属含氧阴离子的环境行为影响;③构建植酸及其降解产物在含水介质中迁移转化的多因素耦合模型,为磷循环机制解析及污染防控提供理论依据。

     

    Abstract: Phytic acid (IP6) accounts for 50%–80% of organic phosphorus. It is input into groundwater systems via plant and animal residues, agricultural activities (e.g., decomposition of phosphate fertilizers and livestock manure), and phytic acid-containing wastes from industrial production. Subsequently, it migrates and transforms in groundwater and aqueous media. Through water-aqueous medium-microorganism reactions, phytic acid affects the occurrence form and bioavailability of phosphorus, posing risks of agricultural non-point source pollution and water eutrophication. This review elaborates on the physicochemical properties, sources, and occurrence forms of phytic acid, compares various detection technologies for phytic acid and its degradation products, and reveals the mechanisms underlying the main environmental behaviors of phytic acid. Existing studies have shown the following: (1) Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) can be used more effectively separate and quantify phytic acid and its degradation products, with high sensitivity, accuracy and precision. (2) The main environmental behaviors of phytic acid in groundwater systems include hydrolysis, biodegradation, and adsorption–desorption, which are mainly regulated by factors such as temperature, pH, hydrochemical components, and mineral composition of the medium. (3) The hydrolysis rate is most significantly affected by temperature, increasing with rising temperature. Biodegradation mainly relies on the secretion of phytase to attack specific phosphate ester bonds, thereby gradually removing phosphate groups and ultimately producing inositol and phosphate ions. Adsorption–desorption has the fastest reaction rate, and phytic acid is adsorbed on mineral surfaces mainly through electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding, and coordination complexation. Among these, iron-aluminum (hydro)oxides exhibit the strongest adsorption capacity for phytic acid. Coexisting oxyanions in groundwater systems (e.g., \mathrmAsO_3^3- , \mathrmAsO_4^3- , and inorganic phosphate \mathrmPO_4^3- ) can also compete with phytic acid for adsorption sites. Phytic acid has a stronger affinity for mineral surfaces, enabling it to desorb adsorbed As and inorganic phosphorus, thereby increasing their bioavailability and raising their eco-environmental risks. It is suggested that future research should focus on the following directions: (1) the biological and abiotic degradation pathways of mineral-adsorbed phytic acid, as well as the environmental risks of its degradation products; (2) the impact of phytic acid on the environmental behaviors of various coexisting metal oxyanions; (3) the construction of a multi-factor coupling model for the migration and transformation of phytic acid and its degradation products in aqueous media, so as to provide a theoretical basis for analyzing phosphorus cycling mechanisms and preventing pollution. The BRIEF REPORT is available for this paper at http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.ykcs.202503280063.

     

/

返回文章
返回