全球金矿石标准物质研制及粒金效应研究进展

Research Progress on the Development of Global Gold Ore Reference Materials and the Nugget Effect

  • 摘要: 标准物质是衡量测试结果准确性的基准,国内外持续研制各类型标准物质以支撑样品测试质量控制、量值溯源和法律仲裁等工作。当前,中国金矿石有证标准物质在种类、定值元素覆盖及低品位段代表性等方面与实际需求存在显著差距,借鉴国际金矿石标准物质研制经验(如类型丰富、定值元素多、低品位段占比高),有助于服务新一轮战略找矿突破。本文基于国内外资源共享平台大数据,系统梳理了全球金矿石标准物质研制现状和关键技术瓶颈。截至2025年6月,国外金矿石有证标准物质超160种,具有类型丰富、定值元素多、低品位段占比高(0.104×10−6~1×10−6区间占比40%)等特点,候选物涵盖绿岩、花岗岩、火山岩、变质岩、石英砾岩等多种岩矿石种类,定值元素涵盖Au、Ag、Cu、Mo、Sb、Al等共伴生元素;中国金矿石有证标准物质有74种,候选物金矿类型主要是石英脉型、蚀变岩型、卡林型3种,定值元素主要是Au或Au、Ag两个元素,多元素同步定值仅5种,低品位段占比小(0.2×10−6~1×10−6区间占比12%)。通过对比,揭示了中国存在类型单一、定值元素局限、低品位覆盖不足等问题。深入分析金矿石加工各环节技术难题,本文指出“粒金效应”是制约标准物质种类丰富度的关键瓶颈,并论证了激光粒度分析法不适用于金矿石加工粒度检查。针对上述差距与挑战,本文建议:加强金矿石加工方法学(特别是针对粒金效应)与专用设备(如大型盘磨机、特种雷蒙磨)研发;系统研制中国典型成矿带系列金矿石标准物质;推行金与共伴生元素同步定值;重点布局边界品位至工业品位区间(尤其是低含量段)标准物质。着力解决因标准物质与实际样品基体差异导致的质控“失控”问题,为全球金矿勘查、选冶、贸易等全产业链提供坚实支撑。

     

    Abstract: Reference materials serve as the benchmark for measuring the accuracy of test results. Both domestically and internationally, continuous efforts are made to develop various types of reference materials to support sample testing quality control, metrological traceability, and legal arbitration. Currently, significant gaps exist between China’s certified reference materials (CRMs) for gold ores and the actual demands, particularly concerning diversity, coverage of certified elements, and representation of low-grade segments. Drawing on international experience in gold ore CRM development—characterized by rich variety, numerous certified elements, and a high proportion of low-grade materials—can better serve the new round of strategic mineral exploration breakthroughs. Leveraging big data from domestic and international resource-sharing platforms, this paper systematically reviews the current status and key technical bottlenecks in gold ore CRM development globally. As of June 2025, over 160 certified gold ore CRMs are available internationally, exhibiting features such as diverse types, multiple certified elements, and a high proportion of low-grade materials (40% in the 0.104-1 ppm range). Candidate materials encompass various rock and ore types, including greenstone, granite, volcanic rock, metamorphic rock, and quartz conglomerate. Certified elements include Au, Ag, Cu, Mo, Sb, Al, and other associated elements. In contrast, China possesses 74 certified gold ore CRMs. The candidate materials are primarily limited to three gold deposit types: quartz-vein type, altered-rock type, and Carlin type. Certified elements are mainly Au alone or Au-Ag pairs, with only 5 CRMs featuring multi-element certification. The proportion of low-grade materials is small (only 12% in the 0.2-1ppm range). This comparison reveals domestic shortcomings, including limited ore type diversity, narrow elemental certification scope, and insufficient coverage of low-grade segments. Through in-depth analysis of technical challenges across gold ore processing stages, this paper identifies the “nugget effect” as a critical bottleneck constraining the diversity of CRM types and demonstrates the inapplicability of laser diffraction particle size analysis for checking the grind size of gold ores. To address these gaps and challenges, this paper proposes the following initiatives: Enhance research on gold ore processing methodologies (especially targeting the nugget effect) and develop specialized equipment (e.g., large disc mills, specialized Raymond mills); Systematically develop series of CRMs for gold ores from China’s typical metallogenic belts; Implement simultaneous certification of gold and associated elements; Prioritize the development of CRMs covering the boundary grade to industrial grade range, particularly the low-concentration segment. These measures aim to resolve the issue of quality control “loss of control” caused by matrix differences between reference materials and actual samples, thereby providing robust support for the global gold industry chain encompassing exploration, mineral processing and metallurgy, and trade.

     

/

返回文章
返回