过氧化钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定钛铝合金中的铬铁钼硅
| 1. | 广西冶金研究院, 广西 南宁 530023 |
| 2. | 玉溪市环境监测站, 云南 玉溪 653100 |
Determination of Chromium, Iron, Molybdenum and Silicon in Ti-Al Alloy by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry with Sodium Peroxide Alkali Fusion
| 1. | Guangxi Research Institute of Metallurgy, Nanning 530023, China |
| 2. | Yuxi Environmental Monitoring Station, Yuxi 653100, China |
摘要：应用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)测定高钛含量的钛铝合金中铬铁钼硅时，单一酸不能使钛铝合金完全溶解；混合酸溶解样品后仍会出现少量杂质、溶解不完全的现象，且复溶时易出现沉淀现象，即使用浓王水也难以将沉淀再溶解。本实验在700℃温度下，采用过氧化钠进行碱熔20 min，盐酸酸化，建立了应用ICP-OES测定钛铝合金中的铬铁钼硅的方法。实验中采用钛基体匹配的方法降低了试液中钛浓度大于200 μg/mL时的钛基体干扰，通过控制过氧化钠使用量来降低待测溶液中的盐分含量保证了测定的稳定性。方法检出限为0.002~0.005 μg/mL，测定下限为0.007~0.017 μg/mL；采用国家标准物质(GBW02501)进行验证，方法的相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.90%~4.89%，相对误差为1.2%~3.6%，回收率为91.6%~103.8%。本方法与酸溶法相比，样品溶解完全，测定准确、可靠，适用于高钛含量的钛铝合金多元素测定。
Determination of Chromium, Iron, Molybdenum and Silicon in Ti-Al Alloy by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry with Sodium Peroxide Alkali Fusion
ABSTRACT Single acid cannot completely dissolve Ti-Al alloy with high Ti content when determining chromium, iron, molybdenum and silicon by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). A small amount of impurity remains after dissolving the samples by mixed acid. Furthermore, the precipitation occurs readily during re-dissolution, even if using concentrated aqua regia. In this study, the Ti-Al alloys were fused with sodium peroxide for 20 min at 700℃ and were acidified by hydrochloric acid. The method for the determination of chromium, iron, molybdenum and silicon in Ti-Al alloy by ICP-OES was established. The interference from the titanium matrix in samples was improved by the titanium matrix matching method when the concentration of titanium was greater than 200 μg/mL. Additionally, the amount of salt content in solution was controlled by sodium peroxide to ensure the stability of determination. The detection limits and lower determination limits are 0.02-0.05 μg/mL and 0.07-0.17 μg/mL, respectively. The method has been verified by analyzing the national standard material (GBW02501). The relative standard deviations (RSDs) are 0.90%-4.89%, the relative errors are 1.2%-3.6% and the recoveries are 91.6%-103.8%. Compared with acid solution, the dissolution of the samples is complete using the proposed method. Moreover, the method is accurate, reliable, and suitable for multi-element determination of Ti-Al alloy with high titanium content.
本文参考文献
| [1] |
Chen R R, Ding H S, Yang J R, et al. Temperature field calculation on cold crucible continuous melting and directional solidifying Ti50Al alloys[J]. Rare Metal Materials & Engineering, 2012, 22(3): 647-653. |
| [2] |
Chen X, Xie F Q, Ma T J, et al. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of linear friction welded Ti2AlNb alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys & Compounds, 2015, 646: 490-496. |
| [3] |
陈学源. 溴化碲分光光度法测定钛铝合金中微量碲[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 1997, 26(4): 56-59. Chen X Y. TeBr4 spectrophotometric determination of trace Te in TiAl alloy[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 1997, 26(4): 56-59. |
| [4] |
牛金龙, 陈学源. 铀试剂光度法测定钛铝合金中微量锑[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 1997, 26(6): 56-59. Niu J L, Chen X Y. 5-Br-PADAP extraction spectro-photometric determination of trace antimony in TiAl alloy[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 1997, 26(6): 56-59. |
| [5] |
陈学源, 牛金龙. 钛铝合金中微量磷的测定[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 1998, 27(2): 119-121. Chen X Y, Niu J L. Determination of trace phosphorus in titanium-aluminium alloys[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 1998, 27(2): 119-121. |
| [6] |
高颂, 庞晓辉, 王桂军, 等. 电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定高铌钛铝合金中硼硅钨锰[J]. 冶金分析, 2013, 33(11): 59-62. Gao S, Pang X H, Wang G J, et al. Determination of boron, silicon, tungsten and manganese in high niobium titanium aluminum alloy by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2013, 33(11): 59-62. |
| [7] |
杜米芳. 电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定钛合金中钼锆铌[J]. 冶金分析, 2015, 35(10): 77-81. Du M F. Determination of molybdenum, zirconium and niobium in titanium alloy by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2015, 35(10): 77-81. |
| [8] |
高颂, 庞晓辉, 梁红玲, 等. 电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定TG6钛合金中镁钒铬铁钴铜锰钼钨[J]. 冶金分析, 2015, 35(3): 51-55. Gao S, Pang X H, Liang H L, et al. Determination of magnesium, vanadium, chromium, iron, cobalt, copper, manganese, molybdenum and tungsten in TG6 titanium alloy by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2015, 35(3): 51-55. |
| [9] |
王卿, 赵伟, 张会堂, 等. 过氧化钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定钛铁矿中铬磷钒[J]. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(6): 971-974. Wang Q, Zhao W, Zhang H T, et al. Determination of Cr, V and P in ilmenite by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry with sodium peroxide fusion[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(6): 971-974. |
| [10] |
王小强, 夏辉, 秦九红, 等. 过氧化钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定多金属矿中的锡钨钛等主次量成分[J]. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(1): 52-58. Wang X Q, Xia H, Qin J H, et al. Determination of Sn, W, Ti and other elements in polymetallic ore by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry with sodium peroxide fusion[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2017, 36(1): 52-58. |
| [11] |
马兰, 余琼, 覃广河, 等. 电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定硼铁合金中的硼[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2015, 51(4): 478-479. Ma L, Yu Q, Qin G H, et al. Determination of boron in ferroboron alloy by ICP-AES[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part B:Chemical Analysis), 2015, 51(4): 478-479. |
| [12] |
聂富强, 杜丽丽, 李景滨, 等. 碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)测定高碳高硅钢中的硅含量[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2015, 5(4): 74-78. Nie F Q, Du L L, Li J B, et al. Determination of silicon content in high carbon and high silicon steel by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry with sodium peroxide fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 5(4): 74-78. |
| [13] |
仝晓红, 刘攀, 聂富强, 等. 碱熔-电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定高碳铬铁中铬[J]. 冶金分析, 2015, 35(9): 36-41. Tong X H, Liu P, Nie F Q, et al. Determination of chromium in high-carbon ferrochrome by alkali fusion-inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2015, 35(9): 36-41. |
| [14] |
赵庆令, 李清彩. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定锆钛砂矿中铪钛锆[J]. 岩矿测试, 2013, 32(6): 883-886. Zhao Q L, Li Q C. Determination of Hf, Ti and Zr in zirconium-titanium placer by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2013, 32(6): 883-886. |
| [15] |
李红光, 王雪, 王哲, 等. 电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定锆钛砂矿中锆钛铁钍铪[J]. 冶金分析, 2014, 34(2): 62-65. Li H G, Wang X, Wang Z, et al. Determination of zirconium, titanium, iron, thorium and hafnium in zirconium-titanium placer by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry[J]. Metallurgical Analysis, 2014, 34(2): 62-65. |
| [16] |
成勇. ICP-AES测定钛合金中硅钒铁铝镍钼铬[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2012, 41(10): 183-186. Cheng Y. Determination of the silicon, vanadium, iron, aluminum, nickel, molybdenum and chromium in titanium alloy by ICP-AES[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2012, 41(10): 183-186. |
相似文献（共20条）
| [1] |
杜米芳. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法同时测定玻璃中铝钙铁钾镁钠钛硫. 岩矿测试, 2008, 27(2): 146-148. |
| [2] |
赵昕, 严慧, 禹莲玲, 汤行, 柳昭. 过氧化钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定钛铁矿中的高含量钛. 岩矿测试, 2020, 39(3): 459-466. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201911020150 |
| [3] |
王小强, 夏辉, 秦九红, 王书勤, 杨惠玲, 宋志敏, 杜天军. 过氧化钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定多金属矿中的锡钨钛等主次量成分. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(1): 52-58. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2017.01.008 |
| [4] |
王卿, 赵伟, 张会堂, 周长祥, 回寒星. 过氧化钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定钛铁矿中铬磷钒. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(6): 971-974. |
| [5] |
胡璇, 石磊, 张炜华. 碱熔融-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定高硫铝土矿中的硫. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(2): 124-129. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2017.02.005 |
| [6] |
王小强. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法同时测定长石矿物中钾钠钙镁铝钛铁. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(3): 442-445. |
| [7] |
杨惠玲, 夏辉, 杜天军, 白露, 秦九红, 铁锦林. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法同时测定锡矿石中锡钨钼铜铅锌. 岩矿测试, 2013, 32(6): 887-892. |
| [8] |
杨载明. 二次熔矿方式电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定棕刚玉中硅铁钛钙镁锆. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(4): 617-620. |
| [9] |
王琰, 孙洛新, 张帆, 张华, 陈志慧. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定含刚玉的铝土矿中硅铝铁钛. 岩矿测试, 2013, 32(5): 719-723. |
| [10] |
赵良成, 郭秀平, 胡艳巧, 程文翠, 王磊, 马会春. 碳酸钠碱熔-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定石墨中的常量元素硅铝钙镁铁钛锰磷. 岩矿测试, 2015, 34(3): 308-313. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.03.008 |
| [11] |
李贤珍, 高小飞, 姚明星, 倪文山, 毛香菊. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定黑钨矿精矿和中矿中的锰. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(3): 438-441. |
| [12] |
罗磊, 付胜波, 肖洁, 魏灵巧, 戴伟峰, 丁晓晓. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定含重晶石的银铅矿中的铅. 岩矿测试, 2014, 33(2): 203-207. |
| [13] |
朱跃华, 冯永亮, 吕东海, 张宁, 朱智星. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法同时测定钒钛磁铁矿中铁钛钒. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(2): 258-262. |
| [14] |
王立平, 杨明灵, 张丽, 吴迪, 赵海珍, 尹剑飞. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法同时测定钒钛磁铁矿中钒钛钴镍. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(3): 450-455. |
| [15] |
赵庆令, 李清彩. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定锆钛砂矿中铪钛锆. 岩矿测试, 2013, 32(6): 883-886. |
| [16] |
郭振华. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定磷矿石中常量元素硅磷硫钙镁铝铁钛锰. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(3): 446-449. |
| [17] |
秦晓丽, 田贵, 李朝长, 蒋智林. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法同时测定地质样品中的钍和氧化钾. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(6): 741-746. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201812290142 |
| [18] |
刘晓杰, 李玉梅, 刘丽静. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定稀土矿石中的三氧化二铝. 岩矿测试, 2013, 32(3): 436-440. |
| [19] |
杨珍, 贺攀红, 张延玲, 孙银生, 荣耀, 张伟. 双毛细管在线干扰校正-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定含铀地质样品中微量铅. 岩矿测试, 2015, 34(5): 528-532. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2015.05.005 |
| [20] |
文加波, 商丹, 宋婉虹, 彭国萍. 电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定铝土矿中镓——酸溶和碱熔预处理方法比较. 岩矿测试, 2011, 30(4): 481-485. |
计量
- PDF下载量(55)
- 文章访问量(11915)
- HTML全文浏览量(5054)
- 被引次数(0)